Construction · SA · South Australia
Commercial building defect claim
Construction expert witness report separated workmanship defects from maintenance and design issues.
Issues clearly allocated- Building
- Multi-tenant commercial fitout
- Defect
- Mixed workmanship, design & maintenance issues
- Forum
- Magistrates Court of South Australia
- Standards
- NCC, AS 1684, AS 1428.1
The dispute
A tenant alleged extensive construction defects across a recently completed commercial fitout. The builder contended that many items were design-driven or arose from poor post-handover maintenance. A construction expert witness report was required to allocate responsibility item by item.
Matter: Tenant fitout dispute, South Australian Magistrates Court
Our expert's findings
Each defect item was assessed against the contract documents, approved design and applicable standards. A Scott Schedule allocated cause to workmanship, design or maintenance, with quantum bands. Approximately half the items were workmanship-related; the remainder were either design choices accepted by the principal or maintenance issues post-handover.
Outcome
Clear allocation enabled a structured negotiation. The matter resolved without trial, with the builder rectifying the workmanship-related items and the principal accepting the design and maintenance items.
Frequently asked questions
What is a Scott Schedule?
A tabular dispute schedule listing each defect with columns for description, location, cause, scope and quantum, used in Australian construction litigation.
Can one expert cover all disciplines?
For mixed matters we coordinate a lead expert with discipline-specific specialists, presenting a single integrated Scott Schedule to the court.
Related services
Need help
Need help?Submit a matter.
Tell us what the dispute requires. We qualify the brief, conflict-check, and allocate the right discipline and jurisdiction — usually within one business day.
- Response within 24 hours
- Conflict-checked
- Strictly confidential